Login | Register
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University ISSN 2304-3334 (Print)  ·  ISSN 2304-3334 (Online)
submit an article
Menu
submit an article
AGRICULTURE, AGROCHEMICAL, FEED PRODUCTION, AGROECOLOGY

ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION

Aigerim Bakhtygizova 1 , Gulnur Suleimanova 1 , Erlan Dutbayev 1 , Aidana Kharipzhanova 2 , Vladimir Tsygankov 3 , ALma Kokhmetova 4

1 NJSC "Kazakh National Agrarian Research University"; 2 NPJSC "Kazakh National Agrarian Research University"; 3 LLP "Kazakh Research Institute of Horse Breeding and Feed Production"; 4 RSE "Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology"

doi.org/10.37884/3-2025/31 pp. 324-334 Admitted 17.07.2025 Published 30.09.2025

Abstract

This research is dedicated to a comprehensive investigation of the impact of common root rot on spring durum wheat under various soil and climatic conditions of Kazakhstan. The research employed modern phytopathological assessment methods, including field, laboratory, and molecular-genetic analyses. Field experiments were conducted in 2024 at two locations (Almaty and Aktobe regions) using a three-factor design: plant growth stages (tillering, harvesting), infection backgrounds (fungicidal, artificial, natural), and 14 wheat varieties 4 lines.

The research focuses on evaluating the effects of common root rot on spring durum wheat in the conditions of Kazakhstan. It was found that the degree of plant infection significantly depended on the growth stage: the highest incidence (51.25%) and disease development (13.78%) were recorded at the harvest stage. The application of fungicides demonstrated high effectiveness, reducing infection by 47% compared to the artificial infection background. Significant varietal differences in resistance were identified: Gordeyforme 254 (20.00%), Yantarnaya 160 (25.71%), and line 248/255 (21.43%) exhibited the lowest susceptibility, while the highest infection levels were observed in the varieties Serke (40.00%) and Yantarnaya 150 (37.14%). The disease had a negative impact on productivity: under the artificial infection background, stem length decreased by 14.6%, spike length by 12%, and grain weight by 9.8%. The highest grain yields were maintained by the varieties Kargala 69 (15.93 g), No. 512 (L-3599; 15.93 g), and No. 545 (Tselinnitsa; 15.33 g).

The results of this research have practical importance for breeding resistant varieties and developing an effective protection system for spring durum wheat in Kazakhstan.

spring durum wheat common root rot Bipolaris sorokiniana varietal resistance pathogen fungicides productivity

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. 1.Mohammadi R., Haghparast R. Durum wheat: production, nutritional value and economic importance//Cereal Biotechnology and Biochemistry.–2022.–Т.1.–№.3.–С.414-445.https://doi.org/10.22126/cbb.2022.8385.1021
  2. 2.Karatayev M. et al. Monitoring climate change, drought conditions and wheat production in Eurasia: The case study of Kazakhstan //Heliyon.–2022.–Т.8.–№.1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08660
  3. 3. TheGlobalEconomy.com. Урожайность зерновых в Казахстане [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Kazakhstan/cereal_yield/(дата обращения: 20.04.2025)
  4. 4.Xu F. et al. Spatial distribution of root and crown rot fungi associated with winter wheat in the North China Plain and its relationship with climate variables//Frontiers in microbiology.–2018. –Т.9.–С.1054.https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01054
  5. 5. Kumar J. et al. Bipolarissorokiniana, a cereal pathogen of global concern: cytological and molecular approaches towards better control//Molecular plant pathology.–2002.–Т.3.–№.4.–С.185-195.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00120.x
  6. 6.Al-Sadi A. M. Bipolarissorokiniana-induced black point, common root rot, and spot blotch diseases of wheat: A review//Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. –2021.–Т.11.–С.584899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.584899
  7. 7.Acharya K., Dutta A. K., Pradhan P. 'Bipolarissorokiniana'(Sacc.) Shoem.: The most destructive wheat fungal pathogen in the warmer areas //Australian Journal of Crop Science. -2011.–Т.5.–№.9.–С.1064-1071. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.044224283000719
  8. 8.Kazan K., Gardiner D. M. Fusarium crown rot caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum in cereal crops: recent progress and future prospects //Molecular plant pathology.–2018.–Т.19.–№.7. –С.1547-1562.https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12639
  9. 9.Su J. et al. Genetics of resistance to common root rot (spot blotch), Fusarium crown rot, and sharp eyespot in wheat //Frontiers in Genetics. –2021.–Т.12.-С.699342.https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.699342
  10. 10.Morgounov A. et al. High-yielding winter synthetic hexaploid wheats resistant to multiple diseases and pests //Plant Genetic Resources. –2018.–Т.16.–№.3.–С.273-278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147926211700017X
  11. 11.Sultanova, N.Z., Uspanov, M., Bekezhanova, M., Sarsenbayeva, G.B. and Rysbekova, A.M., 2021. Morphological signs of barley spot pathogens in the conditions of the Almaty region. Online Journal of Biological Sciences,vol.21,no.2,pp.223-231.http://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2021.223.231
  12. 12.Dutbayev Y. et al. Occurrence of Spot Blotch in Spring Barley Caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana Shoem. in South‐Eastern Kazakhstan //The Scientific World Journal. –2022. – Т.2022. –№.1.–С.3602996. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3602996
  13. 13.Харіпжанова , А. ., Исмаилова , Э. ., Дутбаев , Е. ., Cыбанбаева М. ., & Султанова , Н. (2023). Морфолого-культуральные признаки грибов семян озимой пшеницы в Алматинской области. Izdenister Natigeler,(3(99),81–91. https://doi.org/10.37884/3-2023/08
  14. 14. Kharipzhanova A. et al. Identification and management of Bipolaris sorokiniana in wheat and barley in Southeast Kazakhstan //Brazilian Journal of Biology. – 2025. – Т.84. – С.e288758. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.288758
  15. 15.. Койшыбаев М. Болезни пшеницы / [Текст] / М.Койшыбаев. –Анкара: ФАО, 2018. –394 с. ISBN 978-92-5-130142-5
  16. 16. Дутбаев, Е., Харипжанова, А., Есеркенов, А., Тен, А., Гармашов, С., Попова, Л., Константинова, О. и Сагындыков, У. (2023). Вредоносность обыкновенной корневой гнили на сортах озимой пшеницы в Казахстане. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences , 23 (2),187–192.https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2023.187.192

Citation Links

[1]2025. ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION. Izdenister natigeler. 3 (107) (Sep. 2025), 324–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/3-2025/31.
(1)ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION. Izdenister natigeler 2025, No. 3 (107), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.37884/3-2025/31.
ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION. (2025). Izdenister Natigeler, 3 (107), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.37884/3-2025/31
ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 3 (107), p. 324–334, 2025. DOI: 10.37884/3-2025/31. Disponível em: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1057. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION”. 2025. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 3 (107) (September): 324-34. https://doi.org/10.37884/3-2025/31.
“ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION” (2025) Izdenister natigeler, (3 (107), pp. 324–334. doi:10.37884/3-2025/31.
[1]“ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 3 (107), pp. 324–334, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.37884/3-2025/31.
“ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 3 (107), Sept. 2025, pp. 324-3, https://doi.org/10.37884/3-2025/31.
“ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 3 (107) (September 30, 2025): 324–334. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1057.
1.ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(3 (107):324-3. Available from: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1057
1.ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF AGROTECHNOLOGICAL AND BIOTIC FACTORS ON THE INCIDENCE OF COMMON ROOT ROT IN SPRING DURUM WHEAT IN THE ALMATY REGION. Izdenister natigeler. 2025;(3 (107):324-334. doi:10.37884/3-2025/31