ВЛИЯНИЕ РАЗНЫХ СПОСОБОВ ОБРАБОТКИ ПОЧВЫ НА ЕЕ АГРОФИЗИЧЕСКИЕ И АГРОХИМИЧЕСКИЕ СВОЙСТВА ПОЧВЫ В УСЛОВИЯХ БОГАРЫ ЮГО-ВОСТОКА КАЗАХСТАНА

Рауан Жапаев; Гуля Куныпияева; Жумагали Оспанбаев; Айзада Сембаева; Кудайберген Кыргызбай; Еркин Какимжанов

doi:10.37884/2-1-2024/560

Abstract

The influence of various methods of soil cultivation on the water-physical and agrochemical properties of the soil for the rational use of land in the south-east of Kazakhstan was studied. The density of the soil 0-30 CM increased to a medium compacted state by the traditional method of processing before the period of harvesting the studied crops (1.28-1.29 g/cm3), slightly higher – in minimal (1.30-1.31 g/cm3), maximum zero (1.32-1.33 g / cm3) processing methods. Due to the deficit in the amount of precipitation in the summer season, it was observed that the decrease in productive moisture reserves in the soil before the start of harvesting is 15.9-34.5 mm with traditional tillage, 20.7-36.7 mm with minimal tillage, and 29.8-54.8 mm with zero tillage. The content of nitrate nitrogen in the soil decreased from the initial state to the stage of harvesting cultivated crops, and with zero tillage there was a significant decrease. A long rainy period, accompanied by a decrease in relative air humidity, soil moisture and an increase in temperature, affected the physiology of plants and the productivity of the crops that were subsequently studied. The average maximum yield for the studied crops is 17,6 c/ha in the version with minimal processing. Based on the two-factor analysis of ANOVA on the formation of grain yields, depending on the year of the study, the share of soil processing methods ranged from 0.73-2.89%, to 83.3-93.8%. The formation of a grain crop largely depended on the methods of processing under study, and the dependence was only growing, which is due to the climatic conditions during the seasonal period of the studied crops. Zero tillage in the conditions of the south-east of Kazakhstan leads to a significant reduction in nitrate nitrogen compared to traditional and minimal tillage.

land, land, land, land, land, agricultural crops

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

1. Agboola MO, Bekun FV. Does agricultural value added induce environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from an agrarian country - 2019. En¬viron. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(27): 27660–27676.
2. United Nations. World population prospects: The 2017 revision. New York: United Nations. 2017.
3. Valin H, Sands RD, Mensbrugghe D, Nelson GC, Ahammad H, Blanc E, Bodirsky B, Fujimori S, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Heyhoe E, Kyle P, D'Croz DM, Paltsev S, Rolinski S, Tabeau A, Meijl H, Lampe M. and D. Willenbockel E. Heyhoe, P. Kyle, D.M. D'Croz, S. Paltsev, S. Rolinski, A. Tabeau, Meijl H, Lampe M, Willenbockel D. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics. 2014. 45(1): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12089.
4. Foley JA., Ramankutty N, Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber JS., Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 2011. 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452.
5. IPCC. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2014.J. Cryst. Growth. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00575-3.
6. WRI. Climate Analysis Indicators Tool: WRI's Climate Data Explorer. World Resour. Institute, Washington, 2014. DC http://cait2.wri.org.
7. Lal. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma. 2004.01.032.
8. Korchagin VA, Shevchenko SN, Zudilin SN, Goryanin OI. Innovative technologies for the cultivation of field crops in the agro-industrial complex of the Samara region: A textbook, Kinel: 2014. pp. 192.
9. Derpsch R, Friedrich T, Kassam A, Hongwen L. Current status of adoption of notill farming in the world and some of its main benefits. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2010. 3: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2010.01.001-025.
10. Huang Y, Ren W, Wang L, Hui D, Grove JH, Yang X, Tao B, Goff B. Greenhouse gas emissions and crop yield in no-tillage systems: a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018. 268: 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.002.
11. Krauss M, Ruser R, Müller T, Hansen S, Mäder P, Gattinger A. Impact of reduced tillage on greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon stocks in an organic grass-clover ley - winter wheat cropping sequence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017. 239: 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.029.
12. Karabaev M., Vasko I, Matyushkov M, Bektemirov A, Kenzhebekov A, Bakhman T, Friedrich T, Makus L, Morgunov A, Darinov A, Sagimbaev M, Suraev V, Cherezdanov V, Rodionov A, Wall P. No-till and direct seeding technologies for grain crops in Northern Kazakhstan. Almaty-Astana, 2005. pp. 64.
13. Karabayev M, Wall P, Sayre K, Zhapayev R, Akhmetova A, Zelenskiy Yu, Fileccia T, Friedrich T, Guadagni M, Morgounov A, Braun HJ. Adoption, advancement, and impact of conservation agriculture in Kazakhstan. Proceed. 9th Int. Wheat Conf., Sydney, 2015. pp. 57.
14. Zhapayev R, Toderich K, Kunypiyaeva G, Kurmanbayeva M, Mustafayev M, Ospanbayev Zh, Omarova A, Kusmangazinov A. Screening of sweet and grain sorghum genotypes for green biomass production in different regions of Kazakhstan. Journal of water and land development. 56 (I–III): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.143752 2023.
15. Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experience. - M.: Agropromizdat. 351.
16. Kachinsky NA (1970). Soil physics. Moscow: Higher School. Part II. Water-physical properties and soil regimes. 1985. 363 p.
17. Жусупбеков Е.К*., Амангалиев Б.М*., Хидиров А.Э., Байтаракова Қ.Ж., Рустемова К.У. Влияние способов обработки почвы и минеральных удобрений на урожайность сафлора, возделываемого в условиях светло-каштановых почвах юго-востока Казастана // Ізденістер, нәтижелер – Исследования, результаты. №3 (99) 2023, ISSN 2304-3334.

Citation Links

[1]2024. THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler. 2-1 (special) (Jun. 2024), 233–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/560.

(1)THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler 2024, No. 2-1 (special), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/560.

THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. (2024). Izdenister Natigeler, 2-1 (special), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/560

THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 2-1 (special), p. 233–248, 2024. DOI: 10.37884/2-1-2024/560. Disponível em: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/560. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.

“THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”. 2024. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2-1 (special) (June): 233-48. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/560.

“THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN” (2024) Izdenister natigeler, (2-1 (special), pp. 233–248. doi:10.37884/2-1-2024/560.

[1]“THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 2-1, pp. 233–248, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.37884/2-1-2024/560.

“THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2-1 (special), June 2024, pp. 233-48, https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/560.

“THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 2-1 (special) (June 29, 2024): 233–248. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/560.

1.THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(2-1 (special):233-48. Available from: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/560

1.THE INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS METHODS OF TILLAGE ON THE AGROPHYSICAL AND AGROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE TEACHING OF THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler. 2024;(2-1 (special):233-248. doi:10.37884/2-1-2024/560

[1] 1. Agboola MO, Bekun FV. Does agricultural value added induce environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from an agrarian country - 2019. En¬viron. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(27): 27660–27676.

[2] 2. United Nations. World population prospects: The 2017 revision. New York: United Nations. 2017.

[3] 3. Valin H, Sands RD, Mensbrugghe D, Nelson GC, Ahammad H, Blanc E, Bodirsky B, Fujimori S, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Heyhoe E, Kyle P, D'Croz DM, Paltsev S, Rolinski S, Tabeau A, Meijl H, Lampe M. and D. Willenbockel E. Heyhoe, P. Kyle, D.M. D'Croz, S. Paltsev, S. Rolinski, A. Tabeau, Meijl H, Lampe M, Willenbockel D. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics. 2014. 45(1): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12089.

[4] 4. Foley JA., Ramankutty N, Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber JS., Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 2011. 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452.

[5] 5. IPCC. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2014.J. Cryst. Growth. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00575-3.

[6] 6. WRI. Climate Analysis Indicators Tool: WRI's Climate Data Explorer. World Resour. Institute, Washington, 2014. DC http://cait2.wri.org.

[7] 7. Lal. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma. 2004.01.032.

[8] 8. Korchagin VA, Shevchenko SN, Zudilin SN, Goryanin OI. Innovative technologies for the cultivation of field crops in the agro-industrial complex of the Samara region: A textbook, Kinel: 2014. pp. 192.

[9] 9. Derpsch R, Friedrich T, Kassam A, Hongwen L. Current status of adoption of notill farming in the world and some of its main benefits. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2010. 3: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2010.01.001-025.

[10] 10. Huang Y, Ren W, Wang L, Hui D, Grove JH, Yang X, Tao B, Goff B. Greenhouse gas emissions and crop yield in no-tillage systems: a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018. 268: 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.002.

[11] 11. Krauss M, Ruser R, Müller T, Hansen S, Mäder P, Gattinger A. Impact of reduced tillage on greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon stocks in an organic grass-clover ley - winter wheat cropping sequence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017. 239: 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.029.

[12] 12. Karabaev M., Vasko I, Matyushkov M, Bektemirov A, Kenzhebekov A, Bakhman T, Friedrich T, Makus L, Morgunov A, Darinov A, Sagimbaev M, Suraev V, Cherezdanov V, Rodionov A, Wall P. No-till and direct seeding technologies for grain crops in Northern Kazakhstan. Almaty-Astana, 2005. pp. 64.

[13] 13. Karabayev M, Wall P, Sayre K, Zhapayev R, Akhmetova A, Zelenskiy Yu, Fileccia T, Friedrich T, Guadagni M, Morgounov A, Braun HJ. Adoption, advancement, and impact of conservation agriculture in Kazakhstan. Proceed. 9th Int. Wheat Conf., Sydney, 2015. pp. 57.

[14] 14. Zhapayev R, Toderich K, Kunypiyaeva G, Kurmanbayeva M, Mustafayev M, Ospanbayev Zh, Omarova A, Kusmangazinov A. Screening of sweet and grain sorghum genotypes for green biomass production in different regions of Kazakhstan. Journal of water and land development. 56 (I–III): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.143752 2023.

[15] 15. Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experience. - M.: Agropromizdat. 351.

[16] 16. Kachinsky NA (1970). Soil physics. Moscow: Higher School. Part II. Water-physical properties and soil regimes. 1985. 363 p.

[17] 17. Жусупбеков Е.К*., Амангалиев Б.М*., Хидиров А.Э., Байтаракова Қ.Ж., Рустемова К.У. Влияние способов обработки почвы и минеральных удобрений на урожайность сафлора, возделываемого в условиях светло-каштановых почвах юго-востока Казастана // Ізденістер, нәтижелер – Исследования, результаты. №3 (99) 2023, ISSN 2304-3334.