Login | Register
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University ISSN 2304-3334 (Print)  ·  ISSN 2304-3334 (Online)
submit an article
Menu
submit an article
WATER, LAND AND FOREST RESOURCES

GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN

A.Zh. Shoibekova * 1 , S.K. Jantassov 1 , N.S. Nussipzhanov 1

1 Kazakh National Agrarian Research University

doi.org/10.37884/1-2021/18 pp. 167-176 Admitted 04.03.2022 Published 31.03.2021

Abstract

Grafting of five varieties of pumpkin on a cucumber hybrid was carried out by the method of notch grafting. As rootstocks used the following varieties of pumpkin: domestic - Aphrodite, Karina, Mindalnaya, Mozoleevskaya 10 and Russian selection - Stofuntovaya; as scion, a hybrid of cucumber Asylum, recommended for cultivation in protectedground conditions. The research topic is devoted to the study of the influence of pumpkin rootstocks resistant to the pathogen Fusarium oxysporum on the productivity of the cucumber hybrid F1 Asylum planted in spring-summer rotation in selection greenhouse. The varieties Mozoleyevskaya 10, Stofuntovaya and Karina were selected as resistant rootstocks to Fusarium ochysporum pathogen for further work. The results of investigation of grafting influence on phenological growth, development, yield and quality of fruits of hybrid cucumber Asylum showed that grafting on pumpkin were the best variants in comparison with rooted standard; that is the varieties Karina and Stofuntovaya exceeded standard in early yield by 3, 46 and 3, 39 kg/m2 by 36,7% and 33,9% accordingly. The total productivity of grafting variants of pumpkin varieties Karina and Stofuntovaya exceeded the rootstock standard by 42,38% and 36, 68%.

cucumber, pumpkin, rootstock, scion, grafting, pathogen, yield, protected ground, Fusarium wilt.

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. 1. Гарнер Р. Руководство по прививке плодовых культур. М.: Сельхозиздат 1962. 271 с.
  2. 2. Каратаев Е.С., Борак Сихам С. Рост и развитие растений огурца, привитого на тыкву // Применение регуляторов роста и пленочных материалов в овощеводстве: Сб. тр. Ленингр. с.-х. ин-та. Л., 1987. стр.60-65.
  3. 3. Boughalleb, N., Tarchoun, N., El Mbarki, A., and El Mahjoub, M. 2007. Resistance evaluation of nine cucurbit rootstocks and grafted watermelon (Citrulluslanatus L.) varieties against Fusarium wilt and Fusarium crown and root rot. J. PlantSci. 2: 102–107.
  4. 4. Маденова А.К., Кеишилов Ж.С., Ғалымбек Қ., Атишова М.Н. Қатты қаракүйе (tilletiacaries, t. laevis) ауруына болгариялық сорттардың төзімділігін бағалау // «Ізденістер, нəтижелер - Исследование, результаты». - №2(86). - Алматы, 2020. - С.259-265.
  5. 5. Мамбаева А.Ш., Шемшура О.Н., Саданов А.К., Хидиров К.Р., Лозовицка Б. Антагонизм грибов рода trichoderma как основа борьбы с грибковыми болезнями огурцов в Казахстане // «Ізденістер, нəтижелер - Исследования, результаты». - №1(81). - Алматы, 2019. - С.224-230.
  6. 6. Hong-Wei Wang, Man Xu, Xiao-Yu Cai, Tian Feng, Wei-Li Xu. 2020. Application of spent mushroom substrate suppresses Fusarium wilt in cucumber and alters the composition of the microbial community of the cucumber rhizosphere. European Journal of Soil Biology (IF2.285)Volum101(2020)103245 // https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103245
  7. 7. Xing Liu, Ying Zhang, 2020. Applied Soil Ecology, Exploring the communities of bacteria, fungi and ammonia oxidizers in rhizosphere of Fusarium-diseased greenhouse cucumber https. : //doi.org/10.1016/j. apsoil. 2020. 103832. ISSN0929-1393.
  8. 8. Oda, M., Tsuji, K., and Sasaki, H. 1993. Effects of hypocotyl morphology on survival rate and growth of cucumber seedlings grafted on Cucurbita spp. Japan Agric. Res. Quart. 26: 259–263.
  9. 9. Lee Jung-Myng. Cultivation of Grafted Vegetables 1. Current Status, Grafting Methods, and Benefits //Hort Science. 1994. Vol.29, №4. P.235 - 239.
  10. 10. Груздов С.Ф. Прививка растений. - М.: Сельхозгиз, 1954. - 143 с.
  11. 11. Oda, M. 2002b. Grafting of vegetable crops. Sci. Rep. Agric. &Biol. Sci., Osaka Pref. Univ. 54: 49-72.
  12. 12. Alan O., Zdemir, N., and Nen, Y. 2007. Effect of grafting on watermelon plant growth, yield and quality. J. Agron.6: 362–365.
  13. 13. Ahn S.J., Im Y.J., Chung G.C., Cho B.H., Suh S.R. (1999) Physiological responses of grafted cucumber leaves and rootstock roots affected by low root temperature. SciHortic 81:397–408
  14. 14. Canizares K.A.L., Goto R. Comparacaode metodos de enxertiaem pepino// Hortic. brasil. 2002. Vol. 20, №1. P.95-99.
  15. 15. Alexopoulos, A.A., Kondylis, A., and Passam, H.C. 2007. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting. J. Food, Agr. and Environ.5:178–179.
  16. 16. Методика Государственного сортоиспытания сельскохозяйственных культур (картофель, овощные и бахчевые культуры). - Выпуск 4. - М.: «Колос», 1975. - 183 с.
  17. 17. Методика опытного дела в овощеводстве и бахчеводстве (под ред. В.Ф. Белика). - М., 1992. - 292 с.
  18. 18. Wen-wen Xing, Lin Li, Pan Gao, He Li, Qiao-sai Shao, Sheng Shu, Jin Sun, Shi-rong Guo. Isolation and expression pattern analysis of CmRNF5 and CmNPH3L potentially involved in graft compatibility in cucumber/pumpkin graft combinations Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 87 (2015) p124-132.
  19. 19. Yan Ren, Shi-rong Guo, Sheng Shu, Yang Xu, Jin Sun. Isolation and expression pattern analysis of CmRNF5 and CmNPH3L potentially involved in graft compatibility in cucumber/pumpkin graft combinations //Scientia Horticulturae 227 (2018) p. 92–101//
  20. 20. Nabil I. Elsheery, Mohamed N. Helaly, Samar A. Omar, Sunoj V.S. John, Magdalena Zabochnicka-Swia˛tek, Hazem M. Kalaji, Anshu Rastogi Physiological and molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in grafted Cucumber //South African Journal of Botany 130 (2020) p.90_102.// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.12.014.

Citation Links

[1]2021. GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN. Izdenister natigeler. 1 (89) (Mar. 2021), 167–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2021/18.
(1)GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN. Izdenister natigeler 2021, No. 1 (89), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2021/18.
GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN. (2021). Izdenister Natigeler, 1 (89), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2021/18
GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 1 (89), p. 167–176, 2021. DOI: 10.37884/1-2021/18. Disponível em: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/35. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN”. 2021. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 1 (89) (March): 167-76. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2021/18.
“GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN” (2021) Izdenister natigeler, (1 (89), pp. 167–176. doi:10.37884/1-2021/18.
[1]“GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 1 (89), pp. 167–176, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.37884/1-2021/18.
“GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 1 (89), Mar. 2021, pp. 167-76, https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2021/18.
“GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 1 (89) (March 31, 2021): 167–176. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/35.
1.GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 31 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(1 (89):167-76. Available from: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/35
1.GRAFTING A CUCUMBER HYBRID (LAT. CUCUMIS SATIVUS) ON A PUMPKIN (LAT. CUCURBITA) ROOTSTOCK RESISTANT TO THE FUSARIUM PATHOGEN. Izdenister natigeler. 2021;(1 (89):167-176. doi:10.37884/1-2021/18