ВЛИЯНИЕ СПОСОБОВ ОБРАБОТКИ ПОЧВЫ НА ВОДНО-ФИЗИЧЕСКИЕ СВОЙСТВА ПОЧВЫ В УСЛОВИЯХ БОГАРЫ  ЮГО-ВОСТОКА КАЗАХСТАНА

Рауан Жапаев; Гуля Kunypiyaeva; Жумагали Оспанбаев; Айзада Сембаева; Кудайберген Кыргызбай; Еркин Какимжанов

doi:10.37884/2-1-2024/558

Abstract

For the rational use of rain-fed lands in the south-east of Kazakhstan, the influence of different methods of tillage on its water-physical properties of the soil has been studied. The reserve of productive moisture in the soil for an average of three years in spring, when plowing by 20-22 cm, amounted to 115.9-139.1 mm for all studied crops, 126.2–158.1 mm with minimal treatment by 8-10 cm, 118.2–161.5 mm with zero treatment. Due to the insignificant amount of precipitation in early July, by harvest, there was a decrease in productive moisture reserves for all soil treatments and studied crops due to evaporation and transpiration by plants and amounted to 12.3-22.5 mm when plowing by 20-22 cm, 11.6-28.3 mm with minimal treatment by 8-10 cm, 9.6-27.9 mm with zero treatment. The soil density for the studied crops in the arable soil layer of 0-30 cm showed its significant variation in soil cultivation methods, in spring it was in a loose and slightly compacted state of 1.17-1.21 g/cm3, and during harvesting it increased and became dense 1.28-1.32 g/cm3, especially with zero tillage. The highest yield on average over three years of research with minimal tillage on barley crops was 25.3 c/ha, and the lowest grain yield was noted when plowing on Sudanese grass crops was 6.6 c/ha, and on minimum and zero tillage 7.3 and 9.0 c/ha, respectively. As a result of three-year studies, it was shown that high grain yields were achieved with minimal tillage for spring barley, peas and safflower, and for Sudanese grass with zero tillage.

No-tillage, crop yield, soil structure, barley, peas, safflower, sudan grass

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

1. Kogut BM. Organic matter of the air-dry and water-stable macroaggregates (2–1 mm) of haplic chernozem in contrasting variants of land use. Eurasian Soil Science [Text] / Artemyeva ZS, Kirillova NP, Yashin MA, Soshnikova EI. - 2019. № 52(2). -С. 141-149.
2. Kholodov VA. Interpretation of data on the aggregate composition of typical chernozems under different land use by cluster and principal component analyses [Text] Yaroslavtseva NV, Frid AS. / Eurasian Soil Science. - 2016. 49(9). -С. 102-103.
3. Sabitov MM. Influence of complex application of chemicalization agents on the main diseases and contamination of spring wheat [Text]/ Naumetov RV, Sharipova RB. Perm Agrarian Bulletin. - 2015. № 3(11). -С. 25-32.
4. Kuzina EV. Changes in the yield of winter wheat and grain quality depending on the methods of basic tillage and the level of fertilization [Text]/ Yаkunin AI. Agricultural scientific journal. - 2016. № (11). -С. 24-29.
5. Volters IA. The influence of crop cultivation technologies on agrophysical factors of fertility in various soil and climatic zones of the Stavropol Territory [Text]/ Vlasova OI, Perederieva VM, Trubacheva LV. Vestnik of the Upper Volga Agroindustrial Complex. - 2022. № 4 (60). -С. 12-20.
6. Ospanbayev Z. Tillage system and cover crop effects on organic carbon and available nutrient contents in light chestnut soil [Text]/ Doszhanov A, Abdrazakov Y, Zhapayev R, Sembayeva A, Zakieva A, Yertayeva Z. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science. - 2023. № 12 (3). -С. 238-243.
7. Mrabet R. Chapter 6: Adoption and spread of Conser¬vation Agriculture in North Africa. In. Kassam, A. (ed). Advances in Conservation Agriculture. Adop¬tion and Spread [Text]/ Bahri H, Zaghouane O, Chiekh M’hamed H, El-Areed SRM, Abou El-Enin MM. 2022. Burleigh Dodds, Cambridge, UK, 3. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2021.0088.06
8. Jordan A. Effects of mulching on soil physical properties and runoff under semi-arid conditions in southern Spain [Text]/ Zavala LM, Gil J. Catena. - 2010. № 81. -С. 77-85.
9. Dospekhov BA (1985). Methods of field experience. Agropromizdat. 351.
10. Kachinsky NA (1970). Soil physics. Moscow: Higher School. Part II. Water-physical properties and soil regimes. 363 p.
11. Zhapayev R, Toderich K, Kunypiyaeva G, Kurmanbayeva M, Mustafayev M, Ospanbayev Zh, Omarova A, Kusmangazinov A (2023). Screening of sweet and grain sorghum genotypes for green biomass production in different regions of Kazakhstan. Journal of water and land development. 56 (I–III): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.143752 2023.
12. Кураченко Н.Л., Колесников А.С., Романов В.Н. Влияние обработки почвы на агрофизическое состояние чернозема и продуктивность яровой пшеницы. Сибирский вестник с.-х. науки. – 2018, том 48. №48. -С.44–50.
13. Поляков Д. Г. Обработка почвы и прямой посев: агрофизические свойства черноземов и урожайность полевых культур // Земледелие. - 2021. № 2. -С.37–43.
14. Кузнецова И.В., Азовцева Н.А., Бондарев А.Г. Нормативы изменения физических свойств почв степной, сухостепной, полупустынной зон европейской территории России // Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева. – 2011. - №67. -С.3-19.
15. Жусупбеков Е.К., Амангалиев Б.М., Хидиров А.Э., Байтаракова Қ.Ж., Рустемова К.У. Влияние способов обработки почвы и минеральных удобрений на урожайность сафлора, возделываемого в условиях светло-каштановых почвах юго-востока Казастана // Ізденістер, нәтижелер – Исследования, результаты. №3 (99) 2023, ISSN 2304-3334.

Citation Links

[1]2024. THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler. 2-1 (special) (Jun. 2024), 220–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/558.

(1)THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler 2024, No. 2-1 (special), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/558.

THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. (2024). Izdenister Natigeler, 2-1 (special), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/558

THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 2-1 (special), p. 220–232, 2024. DOI: 10.37884/2-1-2024/558. Disponível em: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/558. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.

“THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”. 2024. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2-1 (special) (June): 220-32. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/558.

“THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN” (2024) Izdenister natigeler, (2-1 (special), pp. 220–232. doi:10.37884/2-1-2024/558.

[1]“THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 2-1, pp. 220–232, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.37884/2-1-2024/558.

“THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2-1 (special), June 2024, pp. 220-32, https://doi.org/10.37884/2-1-2024/558.

“THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 2-1 (special) (June 29, 2024): 220–232. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/558.

1.THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(2-1 (special):220-32. Available from: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/558

1.THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON ITS WATER-PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL IN THE CONDITIONS OF BOGARA IN THE SOUTH-EAST OF KAZAKHSTAN. Izdenister natigeler. 2024;(2-1 (special):220-232. doi:10.37884/2-1-2024/558

[1] 1. Kogut BM. Organic matter of the air-dry and water-stable macroaggregates (2–1 mm) of haplic chernozem in contrasting variants of land use. Eurasian Soil Science [Text] / Artemyeva ZS, Kirillova NP, Yashin MA, Soshnikova EI. - 2019. № 52(2). -С. 141-149.

[2] 2. Kholodov VA. Interpretation of data on the aggregate composition of typical chernozems under different land use by cluster and principal component analyses [Text] Yaroslavtseva NV, Frid AS. / Eurasian Soil Science. - 2016. 49(9). -С. 102-103.

[3] 3. Sabitov MM. Influence of complex application of chemicalization agents on the main diseases and contamination of spring wheat [Text]/ Naumetov RV, Sharipova RB. Perm Agrarian Bulletin. - 2015. № 3(11). -С. 25-32.

[4] 4. Kuzina EV. Changes in the yield of winter wheat and grain quality depending on the methods of basic tillage and the level of fertilization [Text]/ Yаkunin AI. Agricultural scientific journal. - 2016. № (11). -С. 24-29.

[5] 5. Volters IA. The influence of crop cultivation technologies on agrophysical factors of fertility in various soil and climatic zones of the Stavropol Territory [Text]/ Vlasova OI, Perederieva VM, Trubacheva LV. Vestnik of the Upper Volga Agroindustrial Complex. - 2022. № 4 (60). -С. 12-20.

[6] 6. Ospanbayev Z. Tillage system and cover crop effects on organic carbon and available nutrient contents in light chestnut soil [Text]/ Doszhanov A, Abdrazakov Y, Zhapayev R, Sembayeva A, Zakieva A, Yertayeva Z. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science. - 2023. № 12 (3). -С. 238-243.

[7] 7. Mrabet R. Chapter 6: Adoption and spread of Conser¬vation Agriculture in North Africa. In. Kassam, A. (ed). Advances in Conservation Agriculture. Adop¬tion and Spread [Text]/ Bahri H, Zaghouane O, Chiekh M’hamed H, El-Areed SRM, Abou El-Enin MM. 2022. Burleigh Dodds, Cambridge, UK, 3. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2021.0088.06

[8] 8. Jordan A. Effects of mulching on soil physical properties and runoff under semi-arid conditions in southern Spain [Text]/ Zavala LM, Gil J. Catena. - 2010. № 81. -С. 77-85.

[9] 9. Dospekhov BA (1985). Methods of field experience. Agropromizdat. 351.

[10] 10. Kachinsky NA (1970). Soil physics. Moscow: Higher School. Part II. Water-physical properties and soil regimes. 363 p.

[11] 11. Zhapayev R, Toderich K, Kunypiyaeva G, Kurmanbayeva M, Mustafayev M, Ospanbayev Zh, Omarova A, Kusmangazinov A (2023). Screening of sweet and grain sorghum genotypes for green biomass production in different regions of Kazakhstan. Journal of water and land development. 56 (I–III): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.143752 2023.

[12] 12. Кураченко Н.Л., Колесников А.С., Романов В.Н. Влияние обработки почвы на агрофизическое состояние чернозема и продуктивность яровой пшеницы. Сибирский вестник с.-х. науки. – 2018, том 48. №48. -С.44–50.

[13] 13. Поляков Д. Г. Обработка почвы и прямой посев: агрофизические свойства черноземов и урожайность полевых культур // Земледелие. - 2021. № 2. -С.37–43.

[14] 14. Кузнецова И.В., Азовцева Н.А., Бондарев А.Г. Нормативы изменения физических свойств почв степной, сухостепной, полупустынной зон европейской территории России // Бюллетень Почвенного института им. В.В. Докучаева. – 2011. - №67. -С.3-19.

[15] 15. Жусупбеков Е.К., Амангалиев Б.М., Хидиров А.Э., Байтаракова Қ.Ж., Рустемова К.У. Влияние способов обработки почвы и минеральных удобрений на урожайность сафлора, возделываемого в условиях светло-каштановых почвах юго-востока Казастана // Ізденістер, нәтижелер – Исследования, результаты. №3 (99) 2023, ISSN 2304-3334.