Menu
WATER, LAND AND FOREST RESOURCES

INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY

Saltanat Pentaeva 1 , Diana Suleimenova 2 , Toleubek Pentaev 3 , Aizhan Zhildikbaeva 3 , Ablaikhan Baukhan 3 , Virginija Gurskienė 4

1 International Educational Corporation; 2 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; 3 Kazakh National Agrarian Research University; 4 Vytautas Magnus University

doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/39 pp. 397-405 Admitted 24.04.2024 Published 29.06.2024

Abstract

The article provides methods for determining the areas and accuracy of measuring the total and individual parts of the earth's surface, depending on the task, purpose, shape, location and planning and cartographic materials. Any measurement method is not free from errors that affect the final results and requires their investigation. To solve many engineering calculations on the map and plan, graphical, analytical and mechanical methods for determining areas are used. Depending on the chosen method for determining the areas of the measurement elements and their accuracy.

The amount of land use is determined by the production capacity and specialization of the farm. The designed size should be efficient. As already noted, the area and composition of land ownership and land use directly depend on production and the profession of the farm. For example, find the land use area that meets their requirements in accordance with the latter. In other words, it should be rational (rational) – an agricultural institution (partnership or other agricultural formation) located on it is convenient to manage (without spending too much money on distance), providing the necessary areas and field ratios for the successful development of all sectors of the economy.

area, methods, accuracy, measurement results, geometric shapes, formulas, planimeter, design, trapezoid, graphics.

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. 1. Пентаев Т.П., Пентаева С.Б. Геодезия. Оқулық. – Алматы:Эверо, 2016.–164 бет
  2. 2. Бектанов Б.Қ. Геодезия: Оқулық. – Алматы: New book, 2021. – 434 бет.
  3. 3. Маслов А.В., Юнусов А.Г., Горохов Г.И. Геодезические работы при землеустройстве. М.: Недра, 1990, 215 с.
  4. 4. Неумывакин Ю.К., Перский М.И. Земельно-кадастровые геодезические работы. –М.: Колос. 2008, 184 с.
  5. 5. Маслов А.В., Гордеев А.В., Батраков Ю. Г. Геодезия. –М.: Колос, 2007, 598 с.
  6. 6. Михайлова М.А., Рогатнев Ю.М. Земельно-ресурсный комплекс как основа устойчивого развития сельскохозяйственного производства Тарского района // Электронный научно-методический журнал Омского ГАУ. 2016. № 3 (6), июль - сентябрь. 124 с. [Электронный pecypc]. URL: http://e-gournal.omgau.ru/index. php/2016-gol/5/29-statya-2016-2/393-00143.
  7. 7. Aitkhozhaeva G.S., Tireuov K.M., Pentayev T.P. Theoretical and methodological aspects of the modern concept of land relations in Kazakhstan // Research and Results. –2018.– N 3.–pp.190-197.
  8. 8. Экономика сельского хозяйства: реферативный журнал. –2017. № 1; Janovska V., Simova P., Vlasak J., Sklenicka P. Factors affecting farm size on the European level and the national level of the Czech Republic // Agricultural Economics. –2017.–Vol. 63, № 1.– P. 1-12.
  9. 9. Рафиков Т.К, Ерболқызы М., Жилдикбаева А.Н. Применение данных дистанционного зондирования земли и анализа NDVI в Восточно-Казахстанской области//Исследования и результаты.– КазНАИУ.– Алматы, 2024.– № 1.–С. 183-191.
  10. 10. Инструкция по межеванию земельных участков. М.: Росземкадастр, 2002, 29 с.
  11. 11. Купреева Е.Н. Автоматизация геодезических работ при ведении кадастра недвижимости // Актуальные проблемы и перспективы развития геодезии, землеустройства и кадастра недвижимости в условиях рыночной экономики: материалы нац. науч.-практ. конф. / ФГБОУ ВО Омский ГАУ. Омск: Изд-во ИП Макшеевой Е.А., 2017.– 212 с.
  12. 12. Nisula А.-М. A study on cadastral surveying method and cadastral map in the developing countries. Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Real Estate, 1995.

Citation Links

[1]2024. INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY. Izdenister natigeler. 2 (102) (Jun. 2024), 397–405. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/39.
(1)INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY. Izdenister natigeler 2024, No. 2 (102), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/39.
INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY. (2024). Izdenister Natigeler, 2 (102), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/39
INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 2 (102), p. 397–405, 2024. DOI: 10.37884/2-2024/39. Disponível em: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/588. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY”. 2024. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2 (102) (June): 397-405. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/39.
“INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY” (2024) Izdenister natigeler, (2 (102), pp. 397–405. doi:10.37884/2-2024/39.
[1]“INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 2 (102), pp. 397–405, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.37884/2-2024/39.
“INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2 (102), June 2024, pp. 397-05, https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/39.
“INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 2 (102) (June 29, 2024): 397–405. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/588.
1.INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(2 (102):397-405. Available from: https://natsus.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/588
1.INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING AREAS USED IN GEODESY. Izdenister natigeler. 2024;(2 (102):397-405. doi:10.37884/2-2024/39